Friday, February 26, 2010

College Raod Trip : Review


Review By : Amiya Ranjan Chakraborty

GOOD FAMILY MOVIE

First of all I am a huge huge fan of Raven Symone, and I loved her Disney channel serial "THAT'S SO RAVEN" and her previous two big hit movies CHEETAH GIRLS 1 and 2.

This movie is about an overachieving seventeen year old girl named Melanie Porter. She plans a girls only road trip- but then her overprotective father insists on joining her so that he can make sure she goes to the close-to-home college, Northwestern. Of course, that follows with hilarious adventures.

Though this movie got very low rating on IMDB, I personally think it's a very funny and entertaining movie. It wasn't as funny as I thought it would be but it was funny enough for me. It may not be a great movie but definitely not as horrible as it has been rated on IMDB. Martin Lawrence is also one of my favourite actor and he has done a great job in this movie. This movie contain clean humour and doesn't look to sex and vulgarity like other comedy movies usually have, which makes it a good family movie.

And for IMDB critics those who have rated this movie low seriously meet your psychiatrist. Because either you a problem with your humor gene or u are mentally sick.


MY RATING: 8/10

Sunday, February 14, 2010

DHCP-SUPERSCOPE

Ok long time no post,currently installed dhcp in my virtual networking environment,i am using 3 machines,server1(windows 2000 advanced server sp4),server2 (windows 2000 advanced server sp4) and client1 as windows 2000(sp4).Server1 is acting as a dc,dns and dhcp server,server2 and client1 are both dhcp clients,what i did was configure server1 as a network router and the corresponding 2 different networks are 192.168.1.0 and 192.168.2.0 and the clients are supposed to have 2 different ip from these 2 different networks dynamically,to ensure these i have created 2 scope under one superscope and made only one and one ip available from 192.168.1.0 and 192.168.2.0 network so that 2 clients get those different class ips and also can communicate bvetween themselves.

Link
Hope these videos will be helpful


Part1 DHCP-SUPERSCOPE

Part2 DHCP-SUPERSCOPE


Sourav Bhattacharya

Thursday, February 11, 2010

Death at a Funeral



Review by : Sourav Bhattacharya

JUST STUNNING

It's been two weeks I have seen this movie,due to being shocked and awed by it, i dare not say something about it.Practically I am still speachless by it,how am i supposed to describe true greatness when i myself belong in a world of mediocrity,it seemed just too great for me,I loughed so hard that I swear a little pee came out,the movie didn't actually end up just being funny to me as i ended up falling in love with every character of this movie.Movie lovers should see this movie or it's just their loss.

MY RATING: 9.5/10

SOURAV BHATTACHARYA


Monday, February 8, 2010

Royal Rumble 2010



Royal Rumble featured professional wrestling matches involving different wrestlers from pre-existing scripted feuds, plots, and storylines that were played out on Raw, SmackDown, ECW and WWE Superstars—World Wrestling Entertainment's (WWE) television programs. Wrestlers portrayed a villain or a hero as they followed a series of events that built tension,and culminated into a wrestling match or series of matches. All wrestlers were from WWE's Raw, SmackDown and ECW brands—a storyline division in which WWE employees are assigned to a television program of the same name.

The pay-per-view featured the annual Royal Rumble match, which has been featured at every Royal Rumble event since its inception. It features 30 wrestlers, and the match ends when one wrestler remains in the ring, after all 29 other wrestlers have been eliminated via being tossed over the top ring rope and having both feet touch the floor. The winner would earn a worldchampionship match of their choosing at WrestleMania XXVI.

On the December 15, 2009 episode of ECW, general manager Tiffany made an announcement that the ECW brand would host a competition called the "ECW Homecoming", in which the winner will face Christian for the ECW Championship at Royal Rumble. Featuring current and former superstars from the ECW brand, the first round of the competition consisted of eight singles matches. The winners of the matches would then qualify to the "Homecoming Finale" on the January 12, 2010 edition of ECW, where they would fight in an eight-man battle royal that will determine the competition winner. The first two qualifying matches were featured later that night with Ezekiel Jackson defeating Vladimir Kozlov and Kane defeating Zack Ryder.
On the December 22, 2009 episode of ECW, Jack Swagger returned in a losing effort to Yoshi Tatsu, while Vance Archer advanced with a victory over Goldust. On the December 29, 2009 episode of ECW, Matt Hardy and Evan Bourne defeated Finlay and Mike Knox respectively to qualify. The two remaining qualifying matches were held on the January 5, 2010 episode of ECW and saw Shelton Benjamin defeating Chavo Guerrero and CM Punk defeating Mark Henry to qualify. Ezekiel Jackson won the "Homecoming Finale", last eliminating Kane, to earn the right to face Christian at Royal Rumble.Shawn Michaels after being eliminated at Royal Rumble.

It was announced on December 31, 2009 on the company's official website that The Undertaker would be defending the World Heavyweight Championship at Royal Rumble; the means of determining the challenger was stated to be via the "Beat the Clock Sprint", a series of matches that sees who ever wins their match in the fastest time would be declared number-one contender. The sprint, held on the January 1, 2010 edition of SmackDown, consisted of four matches, in which CM Punk, Kane, Chris Jericho, Rey Mysterio, Dolph Ziggler, R-Truth, Matt Hardy and Batista could qualify for if they won their matches in the quickest amount
of time. CM Punk defeated Matt Hardy in his match, setting the time at 7:20. The next match featured Kane and Ziggler; both failed to beat the time limit, thus ruling both men out of winning the match and advancing to the match against for the World Heavyweight championship. Chris Jericho later lost to Rey Mysterio with one second to spare. Mysterio defeated Jericho in 7:19, setting the new time to beat. The final match was Batista versus R-Truth, where the match Align Leftresulted in another time-limit draw, due in part to interference from Mysterio. Despite Mysterio being ruled number-one contender, onscreen consultant Vickie Guerrero overruled the standing, announcing another contenders match the following week between Mysterio and Batista, who had disputably won his match. The rematch between the two on the January 7, 2010 episode of SmackDown was declared a no contest following both men being incapacitated. Another rematch between the two was held on the following week, this time inside a steel cage. Mysterio won the match, earning him the right to face The Undertaker at Royal Rumble.

The main event for Raw was determined on the January 11, 2010 edition with guest host Mike Tyson announcing the winner of a Triple Threat match later that night between John Cena, Kofi Kingston, and Randy Orton would advance to face Sheamus at Royal Rumble for the WWE Championship. Orton ultimately won with the help of Legacy, who took out Cena and Kingston for him.Since November of the previous year, WWE Women's Champion Michelle McCool had been relentlessly insulting Mickie James over a perceived weight issue. The two had a match at TLC: Tables, Ladders & Chairs, which saw McCool win, continuing the torment. James confronted McCool on the January 15 edition of SmackDown during a mocking monologue about James, leading to the champion assaulting her. It was also confirmed that day that McCool would defend her title again at Royal Rumble against James.

Friday, February 5, 2010

Trying out lal tupi(red hat)




Ok, I am a serious Microsoft hater,i have been working as a network administrator and a system engineer and bugged by several security flaws of microsoft's popular operating systems.Recently I have been hearing about Linux and it's non penetrable security and all the other features and moreover being completely free, to be very honest I have tried out linux before and couldn't do much about it as I was a complete novice .Throughout the last couple of months I have been tinkering with linux with all my enthusiasm and learned some stuff.I want to share those in my blog,hope you will find them useful.


I have tried to use new popular linux os like ubuntu,fedora,suse as well as old version of red hat like red hat9 and red hat7.2,the word red hat is interesting enough as the bengali version is "lal tupi",so I finally learned to use tupi(tao abar lal)in the right place at the right time,kudos to our west bengal government,more on later..............


Thursday, February 4, 2010

Threesome (1994):Bold,Beautiful and Thought Provoking


Review By :Sourav Bhattacharya

This is the third time i have seen this movie,and it's greatness never seem to evaporate,the spring of our life "youth" and at that period three children of nature bold enough to explore who they really are,this sensuous adventure is being depicted here very elegantly.Now we live in a hypocritical and extremely cynical society which influences us to be just the way it wants us to be,the social notation of good and bad drives us in every moments of our life and at this situation movies like this are the holy rebel formation of us which help us escape from all the daily drudgery and frame subconsciously the eternal question of "What if........"

I personally found "IMDB.COM" very authentic on reviewing this movie,this is the latest review
of "threesome"(1994) in IMDB,

"the chemistry between the characters on screen is amazing. The realiztation of homosexuality is touching, and also, the fond descriptions that eddy gives throughout the movie is so sweet, verging on bittersweet towards the end. But while i go on about its senitmentality, i have not even begun to express the blatant exploration of sexuality and the funny ways in which all the characters can pull them off. You'll never look at garden gnomes in the same way i can tell you. The ending is so inexplicably satisfying that the only words the need to express after watching this monumental summarization of 90's sexuality is "Let's go back to college!"



Sourav Bhattacharya